Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when | they are used as money-making of attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Model Answer 1 (bands ):-

It is irrefutable that cultural traditions attract lure from all over the world and develop local economy. Some individuals think that these may be destroyed if they are modified to attract tourists. Others, however, hold the view that if we don’t use them for tourism, these cultural attractions will die. ln the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both sides of the argument. l, personally side with the latter view.

We have to make these cultural traditions alluring for tourists, because we need tourists. Firstly, tourism boosts our economy and secondly we get a chance to spread our culture to different countries. lf our artists and artisans do not earn money from their art, which depicts our culture and tradition, then this art will die off and we’ll only be the losers.

Tourism is the backbone of any count4/s economy and every country does its effort to attract tourists. Many people depend on tourism for their livelihood. People in the food industry hotel industry and transport industry depend on tourism. Presentation is very important to attract visitors, and to present nicely some change is unavoidable. On the other hand, when cultural traditions are used as money-making attractions, they lose their original features. Sometimes it makes cultural traditions disappear altogether. However, I believe that culture and tradition are deep rooted and minor superficial changes cannot harm them in any way. Change is the law of nature and all we should look into it that the changes are made with caution to retain the inherent elements of culture.

Summing up, to save cultural traditions we need to make some changes to make them captivating to the tourist of today. lf we don’t do so we’ll lose our cultural traditions altogether and we’ll lose our tourists also.

Model Answer 2:-

The vacation industry is pushing many underdeveloped countries. This process is calculated by many socio-economic benefits and I believe it will have some serious environmental obstacles.
On the one hand, this improvement can bring many benefits to local people and even the government.

First, people in the rest of the world visit culture or history in the countries below. That means there are plenty of opportunities for residents. For example, this job depends on visitors, from food and souvenirs for home and travel. Profits for the government, access to important places, and monuments will be able to contribute to the country’s economy by spending money on a range of goods and services, such as paying for places. Through the tax system, as a result, will undoubtedly promote the nation’s important cultural assets.

On the other hand, despite the main advantages mentioned above, I believe that there are many key factors in the vacation industry that will cause harm to the environment. Most developing countries are likely to be exposed to environmental threats such as air pollution and waste due to increasing numbers of tourists. To improve tourism and structure, some more products and roads have been expanded, which means it has been able to detect emissions from factories and smoke from vehicles. Without strict regulations, these countries can produce a greater amount of waste and have a heavier impact on the planet. Anyway, we will have no reason to burn the ground and pollute the rivers and oceans.

In conclusion, to expand tourism and make less impact on the environment, many developed countries should invest in funds and humanity and mainly apply effective management plans in the vacation industry.

Model Answer 3:-

Historical buildings and places attracted more and more tourists for a long time. Some people argued that using these attractions will destroy their cultural traditions, while others find it an important source of money income to save it. I think using these attractions would be huge benefits for society.

Many people visited traditional places while they were traveling, to explore and find out more about other cultures. The host country had a bonus of increasing numbers of visitors to their old building because their currency rate will increase and as a result, their economy will experience growth. For example, Egypt encourages travelers from all over the world to visit their historical Pyramids, because that is one of the most sources of income for their country, also that will help them to reserve their attraction by saving the money they received from tourists. Moreover, some small shops would increase their sales and trades in tourists seasons. that is why many people supported visiting tourist attractions by foreign people.

On the other hand, some people claim that using these historical landmarks will destroy the traditional culture. excessive usage and walking in some old building would rewind some details, which is hardly to be conserved. for instance, a famous castle in Germany prohibits using cameras or taking photos inside the castle because they simply find it disrespectful and photos may be used in an offensive way to describe their culture.

In conclusion, even though using historical landmarks as a tourist attraction could have a risk of destroying the traditional culture, I completely believe that it is more beneficial and worthy to raise countries economy, also the reward to the contemporary community is massive.

Model Answer 4:–

Traditional cultural symbols are increasingly being used to boost local tourism. Some people support this move as they believe that their local cultures can be perpetuated in this way; however, other people argue that making money from cultural traditions will eventually destroy their indigenous culture. In my opinion, culture-based tourism protects rather than destroys traditional cultures and values.

Integrating traditional cultural aspects with local tourism provides greater exposure to these cultures. To be specific, by showcasing indigenous activities, handcrafts, and artworks in front of international travelers, residents are putting their own cultures under the spotlight of the whole world. This will help spread their culture all over the world and more and more people will be interested in visiting those holiday destinations which are famous for the exotic cultural experiences they provide. This will not only boost local culture and traditions but also help local artists and artisans earn a better livelihood. For example, this is a great way to promote local art and dance forms that may be losing popularity among the native audience.

On the other hand, over-exploitation of cultural traditions for the sake of tourism may inevitably cause issues. If the local culture is coarsely adapted to suit the purpose of tourism, the tourist experience is compromised and this may show the culture in a bad light. For example, when I was traveling in Yunnan Province in Southwest China, I took part in a cultural experience tour to know more about the local culture. However, the tour was poorly designed and all participants were made to buy local handicrafts. It left a negative impression on me and I will not recommend this place to any of my friends.
In other words, for many destinations, the merging/amalgamation of culture and tourism is doing more harm than good.
In conclusion, there is no harm in using culture to promote tourism. It not only enhances the reputation of the country but also provides a livelihood to local artists. However, it is essential to do this aesthetically so that the effect is not counter-productive.